3 research outputs found

    COMAP Early Science: VIII. A Joint Stacking Analysis with eBOSS Quasars

    Full text link
    We present a new upper limit on the cosmic molecular gas density at z=2.43.4z=2.4-3.4 obtained using the first year of observations from the CO Mapping Array Project (COMAP). COMAP data cubes are stacked on the 3D positions of 282 quasars selected from the Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (eBOSS) catalog, yielding a 95% upper limit for flux from CO(1-0) line emission of 0.210 Jy km/s. Depending on the assumptions made, this value can be interpreted as either an average CO line luminosity LCOL'_\mathrm{CO} of eBOSS quasars of 7.30×1010\leq 7.30\times10^{10} K km pc2^2 s1^{-1}, or an average molecular gas density ρH2\rho_\mathrm{H_2} in regions of the universe containing a quasar of 2.02×108\leq 2.02\times10^8 M_\odot cMpc3^{-3}. The LCOL'_\mathrm{CO} upper limit falls among CO line luminosities obtained from individually-targeted quasars in the COMAP redshift range, and the ρH2\rho_\mathrm{H_2} value is comparable to upper limits obtained from other Line Intensity Mapping (LIM) surveys and their joint analyses. Further, we forecast the values obtainable with the COMAP/eBOSS stack after the full 5-year COMAP Pathfinder survey. We predict that a detection is probable with this method, depending on the CO properties of the quasar sample. Based on these achieved sensitivities, we believe that this technique of stacking LIM data on the positions of traditional galaxy or quasar catalogs is extremely promising, both as a technique for investigating large galaxy catalogs efficiently at high redshift and as a technique for bolstering the sensitivity of LIM experiments, even with a fraction of their total expected survey data.Comment: 15 pages, 8 figures. To be submitted to Ap

    COMAP Early Science: VIII. A Joint Stacking Analysis with eBOSS Quasars

    Get PDF
    We present a new upper limit on the cosmic molecular gas density at z = 2.4 − 3.4 obtained using the first year of observations from the CO Mapping Array Project (COMAP). COMAP data cubes are stacked on the 3D positions of 243 quasars selected from the Extended Baryon Oscillation SpectroscopicSurvey (eBOSS) catalog, yielding a 95% upper limit for flux from CO(1-0) line emission of 0.129 Jykm/s. Depending on the balance of the emission between the quasar host and its environment, this value can be interpreted as an average CO line luminosity L′CO of eBOSS quasars of ≤ 1.26 × 1011 K km pc2s−1, or an average molecular gas density ρH2 in regions of the universe containing a quasar of ≤ 1.52 × 108 M⊙ cMpc−3. The L′ CO upper limit falls among CO line luminosities obtained fromindividually-targeted quasars in the COMAP redshift range, and the ρH2 value is comparable to upper limits obtained from other Line Intensity Mapping (LIM) surveys and their joint analyses. Further, we forecast the values obtainable with the COMAP/eBOSS stack after the full 5-year COMAP Pathfinder survey. We predict that a detection is probable with this method, depending on the CO properties of the quasar sample. Based on the achieved sensitivity, we believe that this technique of stacking LIM data on the positions of traditional galaxy or quasar catalogs is extremely promising, both asa technique for investigating large galaxy catalogs efficiently at high redshift and as a technique for bolstering the sensitivity of LIM experiments, even with a fraction of their total expected survey data

    COMAP Early Science: IV. Power Spectrum Methodology and Results

    Full text link
    We present the power spectrum methodology used for the first-season COMAP analysis, and assess the quality of the current data set. The main results are derived through the Feed-feed Pseudo-Cross-Spectrum (FPXS) method, which is a robust estimator with respect to both noise modeling errors and experimental systematics. We use effective transfer functions to take into account the effects of instrumental beam smoothing and various filter operations applied during the low-level data processing. The power spectra estimated in this way have allowed us to identify a systematic error associated with one of our two scanning strategies, believed to be due to residual ground or atmospheric contamination. We omit these data from our analysis and no longer use this scanning technique for observations. We present the power spectra from our first season of observing and demonstrate that the uncertainties are integrating as expected for uncorrelated noise, with any residual systematics suppressed to a level below the noise. Using the FPXS method, and combining data on scales k=0.0510.62Mpc1k=0.051-0.62 \,\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1} we estimate PCO(k)=2.7±1.7×104μK2Mpc3P_\mathrm{CO}(k) = -2.7 \pm 1.7 \times 10^4\mu\textrm{K}^2\mathrm{Mpc}^3, the first direct 3D constraint on the clustering component of the CO(1-0) power spectrum in the literature.Comment: Paper 4 of 7 in series. 18 pages, 11 figures, as accepted in Ap
    corecore